Skip to main content

> tpl_gov_003

Enterprise Architecture Decision Framework

Governance framework standardizing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs), Architecture Review Board (ARB) submission gates, exception waivers, and Tech Radar lifecycles.

TEMPLATE // INSPECT: TPL-GOV-003MODIFIED: 2026-09-19
CATEGORYExecutive Governance & Risk
VERSIONv1.0.0
RISK LEVELMEDIUM
ARTIFACT CLASSXLS
FORMATSPDF, MD, MERMAID, SVG, XLSX
AI & EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Architectural governance system formalizing lightweight ADR documentation in code, ARB peer review thresholds, and enterprise technology stack lifecycles.

Important Tech Document Template & Operational Notice

TinyCTO.tv Tech Document Template Notice: This template is a general educational and operational starting point. It is not legal, tax, accounting, investment, procurement, regulatory, security or certification advice. Requirements vary by jurisdiction, organization, contract and risk. Review and adapt it with qualified professionals before relying on it.

Problem Solved

Engineering teams frequently make irreversible architectural choices (e.g. database engines, auth protocols, messaging brokers) in silos without documenting tradeoffs, leading to crippling technical debt and architectural chaos.

When to Use

  • Standardizing how software and cloud architects capture critical design tradeoffs using ADRs in git repos
  • Defining ARB evaluation criteria, review cadences, and automated waiver expiration timers
  • Publishing a company-wide Technology Radar establishing Adopt, Trial, Assess, and Hold guidelines

When NOT to Use

  • For daily minor code refactoring within a single function
  • For routine dependency patch bumps in package.json

5 Template Sections & Structural Outline

1. 1. Architecture Decision Principles & Taxonomystandard, enterprise

When to write an ADR (irreversible, high blast radius, cross-team impact) vs tactical RFC.

Guidance:Mandate ADRs for any decision requiring more than 2 engineer-weeks to reverse.
2. 2. The Lightweight ADR Format & Git-Based Workflowstandard, enterprise

Title, Status (Draft, Accepted, Deprecated, Superseded), Context, Decision, Consequences.

Guidance:Store ADR markdown files directly in the codebase repo (/docs/adr/) alongside source code.
3. 3. Architecture Review Board (ARB) Submission & Review Gatesstandard, enterprise

Pre-flight checklists, weekly review cadences, peer architect review, and escalation triggers.

Guidance:Limit formal ARB presentation time to 20 minutes, reserving 40 minutes for technical stress-testing.
4. 4. Architectural Exceptions, Waivers & Technical Debt Trackingstandard, enterprise

Temporary exemption criteria, time-boxed validity (maximum 90 days), and risk acceptance.

Guidance:Automatically expire all architectural waivers after 90 days unless formally renewed with CISO sign-off.
5. 5. Technology Radar Governance (Adopt, Trial, Assess, Hold)standard, enterprise

Quarterly review of languages, frameworks, datastores, and cloud managed services.

Guidance:Prohibit new production deployments of any technology designated in the Hold category.

Completion Instructions

1. Review blank document. 2. Adapt worked scenario to company scale. 3. Validate against review checklist.

Independent Review Checklist

  • All mandatory sections completed
  • No secrets or passwords included
  • Executive sponsor sign-off obtained
WORKED SCENARIO SHOWCASE

Enterprise Architecture Decision Framework - Worked Case Study

Fictional Entity: ApexScale Cloud Commerce

Real-world production case study demonstrating complete operational adoption for ApexScale Cloud Commerce.

Key Highlights & Outputs:
  • Published 140+ ADRs version-controlled in monorepo, eliminating architectural amnesia
  • Established weekly ARB approving 92% of submissions within 5 business days
  • Deprecated 6 legacy datastores into Hold quadrant, cutting support overhead by 35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Where should Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) be stored?

Directly in the git repository alongside the relevant source code (e.g. /docs/adr/) so decisions evolve with the software.

How do you keep the Technology Radar relevant and not just a static wiki page?

Re-evaluate the radar quarterly through an open nomination process led by the Principal Engineers community.

Can a team deploy a technology in the Hold category if they have an urgent deadline?

Only with a formal, time-boxed architectural waiver approved by the ARB Chair and CTO, expiring in 90 days.

Download Tech Document Pack

Auth Required
Free instant downloads require a quick sign in or registration.
Complete Tech Document Pack (.zip)
12 Files

Download all blank templates, worked scenarios, and verification manifests in a single verified archive.

Individual Artifacts (.zip)
TPL-GOV-003-Enterprise-Risk-Register-and-Treatment-Plan-Blank-EN.xlsxXLSX
all10.0 KB
TPL-GOV-003-Enterprise-Risk-Register-and-Treatment-Plan-Example-EN.xlsxXLSX
all10.0 KB
TPL-GOV-003-Kurumsal-Risk-K-t-ve-yile-tirme-Plan-Bos-TR.xlsxXLSX
all10.0 KB
TPL-GOV-003-Kurumsal-Risk-K-t-ve-yile-tirme-Plan-Ornek-TR.xlsxXLSX
all10.0 KB
TPL-GOV-003-Enterprise-Architecture-Decision-Framework-Blank-EN.pdfPDF
all97.5 KB
TPL-GOV-003-Enterprise-Architecture-Decision-Framework-Example-EN.pdfPDF
all96.8 KB
TPL-GOV-003-Kurumsal-Mimari-Karar-Cercevesi-Bos-TR.pdfPDF
all98.4 KB
TPL-GOV-003-Kurumsal-Mimari-Karar-Cercevesi-Ornek-TR.pdfPDF
all100.3 KB
TPL-GOV-003-Enterprise-Architecture-Decision-Framework-Blank-EN.mdMD
all2.0 KB
TPL-GOV-003-Enterprise-Architecture-Decision-Framework-Example-EN.mdMD
all2.0 KB
TPL-GOV-003-Kurumsal-Mimari-Karar-Cercevesi-Bos-TR.mdMD
all2.1 KB
TPL-GOV-003-Kurumsal-Mimari-Karar-Cercevesi-Ornek-TR.mdMD
all2.1 KB
Verified SHA-256 · Zero Macros Verified Archive
Every download includes an authoritative MANIFEST.json

Authoritative Sources